ArticleScientific reports2026
Combining gait analysis and finite element modeling to optimize offloading insoles for calcaneal ulcers.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Calcaneal ulcers, a significant complication in diabetic patients, are primarily caused by sustained mechanical stress. Therefore, making effective offloading is crucial for healing and prevention. However, a comprehensive understanding of how different geometric offloading elements and their volumetric variations influence biomechanical efficacy remains limited. The aim of this study is to systematically investigate three distinct offloading insole geometries (cylindrical, spherical, conical), each across three volumetric variations (10 mm, 20 mm, and 30 mm diameters) to reveal the exact biomechanical efficacy. In this scope, patient specific dynamic gait analysis results were utilized to perform more accurate Finite Element Analysis (FEA). A single healthy researcher was used as a model for this feasibility assessment. Gait analysis showed that all geometries reduced overall peak plantar pressure compared to barefoot walking. Findings indicated that the conical geometry achieved the greatest pressure reduction (approximately 34.5% in both feet). However, FEA revealed that this configuration also introduced higher localized stress concentrations, particularly in larger diameters. The spherical geometry offered a balanced approach with adequate offloading and more favorable internal stress distribution. The cylindrical geometry exhibited the most consistent and lowest stress values across all sizes, with predictable scaling. The relationship between void volume and offloading effectiveness was found to be non-linear and highly geometry-dependent. The integration of gait analysis and FEA provides a robust framework for evaluating offloading insoles, offering insights into both immediate pressure reduction and long-term material performance. These findings deliver evidence-based guidelines for the rational design of patient-specific offloading interventions, contributing to improved wound healing and reduced recurrence in calcaneal ulcer management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.