ArticleWorld journal of pediatrics : WJP2026
Artificial intelligence in diagnosis of pediatric neurodevelopmental disorders: a scoping review.
Article in World journal of pediatrics : WJP, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- AΙ-Driven Interventions for Neurocognitive, Self-Regulation, and Adaptive Skill Development in Neurodevelopmental and Cognitive Disorders: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence, equity, and pediatric neurodevelopmental disorders: A scoping review of clinical practice applications.Pediatric investigation · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNeurodevelopmental disorders are a group of conditions that affect key areas of development and may significantly impact a child's quality of life. This underscores the importance of accurate diagnostic tools to improve outcomes. Artificial intelligence (AI) has shown measurable effectiveness for enhancing the diagnosis and monitoring of neurodevelopmental disorders. This scoping review aims to summarize the current evidence on the use of AI technologies, including deep learning, supervised machine learning, decision support systems, and biosignal analysis, in improving diagnostic accuracy for pediatric neurodevelopmental disorders. DATA SOURCES: A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, LILACS, MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and psychology-indexed journals, covering publications from 2000 to January 2025. Keywords and Medical Subject Headings terms were used to search for and select studies, applying specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Selection followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines and included clinical studies, reviews, and validation research. The data were extracted and synthesized descriptively.
resultsTwenty-two studies were included. Deep learning models achieved diagnostic accuracies exceeding 85% in most studies in neuroimaging interpretation, whereas supervised machine learning improved the subtype classification of autism spectrum disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Decision support systems have increased diagnostic efficiency, and biosignal-based AI has shown potential in identifying physiological markers related to neurodevelopmental disorders.
conclusionsAI technologies may significantly contribute to improving early diagnosis and clinical decision-making in pediatric neurodevelopment. However, variability in study design, population, and algorithm standardization remains a challenge. AI technologies are also facing ethical concerns such as data privacy and security, interpretability, equity and access, and algorithmic bias. Further multicenter validation and regulatory frameworks are essential for clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.