Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41593250›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Multi-scenario simulation of land use change and landscape ecological vulnerability analysis in Fuzhou City based on GA-PLUS coupled modeling.

Fengjuan Zhou, Juan Wang, Zhongxiang Li, Daoyuan Zhou, Tingting Hu, Fuhe Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fengjuan ZhouForestry College, Xinyang Agriculture and Forestry University, No. 1, Beihuan Road, Pingqiao District, Xinyang City, 464000, Henan Province, China.
Juan WangForestry College, Xinyang Agriculture and Forestry University, No. 1, Beihuan Road, Pingqiao District, Xinyang City, 464000, Henan Province, China.
Zhongxiang LiShangcai County Forestry Development Service Center, No. 68 Rongguang Road, Shangcai County, Henan Province, China.
Daoyuan ZhouForestry College, Xinyang Agriculture and Forestry University, No. 1, Beihuan Road, Pingqiao District, Xinyang City, 464000, Henan Province, China.
Tingting HuForestry College, Xinyang Agriculture and Forestry University, No. 1, Beihuan Road, Pingqiao District, Xinyang City, 464000, Henan Province, China.
Fuhe WangForestry College, Xinyang Agriculture and Forestry University, No. 1, Beihuan Road, Pingqiao District, Xinyang City, 464000, Henan Province, China. zfj1604243079@126.com.

Funding

Xinyang Academy of Ecological Research Open Foundation 2023XYZD04Youth Teacher Foundation Project of Forestry College, Xinyang Agriculture and Forestry University in 2024 QN2024003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The urbanization process has intensified land use changes and ecological pressure, and landscape ecological vulnerability assessment has become a key scientific issue. Taking Fuzhou City as an example, this study constructs a GA-PLUS coupled model based on land use data in 2000, 2010 and 2020, and sets three scenarios of natural development (ND), economic development (ED) and ecological protection (EP) to simulate the spatial pattern of land use in 2030. Unlike traditional approaches that optimize land use areas directly, this study innovatively targets transition probability matrices, enabling more effective scenario differentiation and deeper revelation of policy-driven land conversion mechanisms. The landscape pattern index and landscape vulnerability index were applied to analyze the spatial and temporal evolution characteristics of landscape ecological vulnerability. The results show that: (1) from 2000 to 2020, land use in Fuzhou City has changed significantly, with an increase of 474.68 km2 in construction land and a decrease of 506 km2 in forest land, presenting a spatial pattern of “arable land as the main body, forest land scattered, and construction land clustered”. (2) The simulation of the three scenarios shows that the ED scenario shows the most significant expansion of construction land (change rate of 8.14%), the EP scenario shows the most increase of ecological land, and the ND scenario maintains a relatively balanced development. (3) Landscape pattern changes showed increased fragmentation, but patch cohesion maintained a high level (> 99.95%), and the EP scenario had the highest landscape diversity (SHDI = 0.9164). (4) The landscape ecological vulnerability showed a spatial pattern of “high vulnerability in the southeast and low vulnerability in the northwest”, and the EP scenario could improve the vulnerability situation most effectively, and the area of severely vulnerable area was reduced to 5.70%. The land use change and landscape ecological vulnerability analysis of Fuzhou City were effectively simulated, which provided an important scientific basis for the sustainable development of Fuzhou City.

Indexed as

Fuzhou cityGA-PLUS modelLandscape ecological vulnerabilityLand use changeMulti-scenario simulation

Identifiers

PMID41593250
PMCPMC12905204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.