ArticleScientific reports2026
Distributed generation and shunt capacitor allocation in radial distribution power networks using a hybrid optimization approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article proposes a new hybrid approach for determining the optimal locations and sizes of distributed generation (DG) and shunt capacitor (SC) units in a radial distribution power network (RPDN). The hybrid framework is introduced, integrating the global search competency of the Whale Optimizer Algorithm (WOA) with the local search proficiency of the Osprey Optimizer Algorithm (OOA) to achieve a better quality solution for the simultaneous DG/SC allocation problem. The hybrid technique assesses its efficacy for different combinations of DG and SC unit allocations on the different-sized RDPNs, including 33-bus, 69-bus, and 118-bus benchmark systems. The optimization problem is solved for single- and multi-objective functions addressing active power loss (APL) reduction, bus voltage (BV) improvement, and operating cost reduction. For a single unit of DG and SC placement, the APL of the 33-bus RDPN is minimized by 77.29%. In contrast, the second combination involving two units of DG/SC placement achieves a PL reduction of 89.61%. Likewise, the first and second combinations of simultaneous DG/SC integration in the 69-bus RDPN yield 52.67% and 74.97% of APL reduction, respectively. Further, the application of the hybrid algorithm is investigated on the 118-bus RPDN for evaluating its effectiveness and scalability to large power networks. Additionally, for multi-objective problems, the optimized single-unit DG/SC allocation inside the 69-bus RDPN reduces the power losses (PL) by 55.70% and enhances minimum BV to 0.9686 per unit for the operational cost of $15266.78. Moreover, the proposed Hybrid Whale- Osprey Algorithm (HWOA) effectively addressed the load uncertainty in the 69-bus RDPN, minimizing the PL and enhancing the BV above the critical value. The quantitative simulation findings showcase the better PL reduction compared to similar works addressed in the literature, demonstrating the benefits of integrating the exploration and exploitation behaviors of WOA and OOA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.