ReviewActa pharmacologica Sinica2026
ER-phagy receptors: structural mechanisms in selective ER degradation and disease implications.
Review in Acta pharmacologica Sinica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The multifaceted functions of selective autophagy in cancer: molecular basis, consequences, and clinical prospects.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- Unveiling ER-Phagy Receptors in Thyroid Cancer: A Combined Approach of Public Data Mining and In Vitro Validation.Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology · 2026Article
- The role of endoplasmic reticulum stress-mediated autophagy in cadmium-induced liver injury in rats.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is a central organelle for protein synthesis and folding, lipid metabolism and calcium signaling, etc. To maintain ER homeostasis, cells employ a specific autophagy process termed ER-phagy (reticulophagy), which depredates ER components via three forms: macro-ER-phagy (involving bulk ER sequestration), micro-ER-phagy (lysosome-direct), and ER-to-lysosome-associated degradation (ERLAD). The identification of specific ER-phagy receptors including FAM134A, FAM134B, FAM134C, TEX264, SEC62, RTN3L, CCPG1, ATL3, CALCOCO1 and others has significantly advanced our understanding of ER quality control mechanisms. In this review we summarize the current knowledge on ER-phagy receptors, and emerging evidence linking ER-phagy dysfunction to various disease pathologies including neurological disorders, cancer, metabolic diseases, cardiovascular diseases, infections and immune disorders. Recent evidence shows that ER-phagy receptors can form novel ER-derived structures, such as ER-tubular bodies (ER-TBs) consisted of ATL3 and RTN3L, which mediate Golgi-bypassing unconventional protein secretion under stress conditions, revealing non-degradative functions of these receptors beyond quality control. Targeting ER-phagy receptors may provide insights into potential therapeutic strategies for diseases associated with this fundamental cellular process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.