ArticleScientific reports2026
Study on urban residents' travel mode choice based on the CART-Apriori method.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study was conducted to investigate the travel behavior of residents in a medium-sized Chinese city, with the goal of exploring travel characteristics and identifying the key factors influencing urban travel mode choices. While traditional discrete choice models are known for their strong interpretability, their predictive accuracy remains limited. In contrast, machine learning models are recognized for offering higher predictive accuracy but are frequently criticized for their lack of interpretability. To address this issue, a CART-Apriori predictive model was constructed through the integration of the Classification and Regression Tree (CART) model and the Apriori algorithm. Accuracy, the Kappa coefficient, and the Macro-F1 score were utilized as performance metrics for the quantitative comparison of the CART-Apriori model with various alternative models. Additionally, the RuleFit model was employed to extract nonlinear relationships generated by the CART-Apriori model. These relationships were subsequently converted into rule-based features and incorporated into a multinomial Logit linear model to identify the most influential travel rules for each travel mode. The results demonstrated that an average overall prediction accuracy of 82.77% was attained by the CART-Apriori model. Using the Apriori association rule algorithm, the most critical factors influencing urban residents' travel mode choices were ranked in descending order of importance as travel distance, travel purpose, car ownership, and the number of transfers. When walking was chosen as the travel mode, travel distance played a dominant role. When shared electric vehicles or private cars were chosen, travelers were primarily motivated by the intention to reach their destinations directly. Shared bicycles were predominantly chosen by commuters traveling 1-3 km. For bus users, travel distance and the number of transfers were the most influential factors. Ride-hailing users were primarily commuters traveling 1-3 km who required multiple transfers on public transportation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.