Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41593195›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Study on urban residents' travel mode choice based on the CART-Apriori method.

Hui Song, Xinxin Wang, Wen Tian, Lina Shi, Shiqi Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hui SongCollege of Air Transportation, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai, 201620, China.
Xinxin WangCollege of Air Transportation, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai, 201620, China.
Wen TianCollege of Civil Aviation, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, 211106, China.
Lina ShiCollege of Air Transportation, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai, 201620, China. shilina_sues@163.com.
Shiqi LiCollege of Air Transportation, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai, 201620, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 72471115Project of Humanities and Social Sciences Research Planning Fund, Ministry of Education of China 24YJAZH168
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate the travel behavior of residents in a medium-sized Chinese city, with the goal of exploring travel characteristics and identifying the key factors influencing urban travel mode choices. While traditional discrete choice models are known for their strong interpretability, their predictive accuracy remains limited. In contrast, machine learning models are recognized for offering higher predictive accuracy but are frequently criticized for their lack of interpretability. To address this issue, a CART-Apriori predictive model was constructed through the integration of the Classification and Regression Tree (CART) model and the Apriori algorithm. Accuracy, the Kappa coefficient, and the Macro-F1 score were utilized as performance metrics for the quantitative comparison of the CART-Apriori model with various alternative models. Additionally, the RuleFit model was employed to extract nonlinear relationships generated by the CART-Apriori model. These relationships were subsequently converted into rule-based features and incorporated into a multinomial Logit linear model to identify the most influential travel rules for each travel mode. The results demonstrated that an average overall prediction accuracy of 82.77% was attained by the CART-Apriori model. Using the Apriori association rule algorithm, the most critical factors influencing urban residents' travel mode choices were ranked in descending order of importance as travel distance, travel purpose, car ownership, and the number of transfers. When walking was chosen as the travel mode, travel distance played a dominant role. When shared electric vehicles or private cars were chosen, travelers were primarily motivated by the intention to reach their destinations directly. Shared bicycles were predominantly chosen by commuters traveling 1-3 km. For bus users, travel distance and the number of transfers were the most influential factors. Ride-hailing users were primarily commuters traveling 1-3 km who required multiple transfers on public transportation.

Indexed as

Apriori algorithmCART modelInterpretable rulefit modelMachine learningTravel mode

Identifiers

PMID41593195
PMCPMC12905192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.