Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41593174›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Optimization based load forecasting and demand management in smart building microgrids with Greylag Goose and Bi level graph models.

B Shamreen Ahamed, D Dhanya, M Sivaramkrishnan, T Arun Srinivas, Ahmed Adnan Hadi, Shafat Khan, Wahaj Ahmad Khan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

B Shamreen AhamedDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600119, India.
D DhanyaDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Data Science, Mar Ephraem College of Engineering and Technology, Marthandam, Kanniyakumari, Tamil Nadu, 629171, India.
M SivaramkrishnanDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Karpagam College of Engineering, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641108, India. Krishbe95@gmail.com.
T Arun SrinivasDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, J.P. College of Engineering, Tenkasi, Tamil Nadu, 627852, India.
Ahmed Adnan HadiArtificial Intelligence Sciences Department, College of Sciences, Al-Mustaqbal University, Babil, 51001, Iraq.
Shafat KhanDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computer Science, King Khalid University, Abha , Saudi Arabia.
Wahaj Ahmad KhanSchool of Civil Engineering & Architecture, Institute of Technology, Dire-Dawa University, 1362, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia. khanwahajahmad@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effective use of energy in Smart Building Microgrids (SBMGs) largely depends on accurate load prediction and synchronized demand response especially with battery degradation and unreliability of renewable power. In spite of progress, problems of inaccuracies in forecasting, mismatch in demand and supply, and non-optimal optimization methods still ruin the reliability of the system and the durability of battery resources. A domain-adapted forecasting and optimization framework is proposed in this paper intending to combine Greylag Goose Optimization (GGO) with a Relational Bi-Level Aggregation Graph Convoluted Network (RBAGCN) to be used in SBMGs. In this context, the RBAGCN has been reengineered to incorporate physical and operating interrelations among the energy variables, and the GGO has been utilized to stabilize network weight convergence when the load is non-stationary, as opposed to being an independent optimizer. Before the training of a model, Fast Resampled Iterative Filtering (FRIF) is used to clean up and normalize historical sequential data and Prairie Dog Optimization (PDO) is used to remove the least salient features, i.e. three phase discharge power, battery discharge power, time of day, solar voltage, and ambient temperature. The modified RBAGCN performs load forecasting and demand-based management forecasting, and the GGO automatically adjusts the model parameters to improve convergence strength. As the simulation experiments with the MATLAB R2022b show, the proposed framework achieves an average forecasting accuracy of 98.3%, which is better than the benchmark models, including RNN (82.6%), ABMO-ANN (85.4%), RNN-LSTM (91.7%), GA-DNN (88.5%), and RNN-GRU (90.3%). In addition to this, the framework has lower error measures, such as mean absolute error of 0.0164, mean absolute percentage error of 0.0128, and mean squared error of 0.0069 as compared to benchmark values of 0.042, 0.037 and 0.031 respectively. Moreover, prediction variance and convergence iterations are decreased to 26.5% and 17.8%, respectively, which suggests a higher level of statistical stability and demand management learning efficiency of SBMG load prediction and battery-conscious demand management.

Indexed as

And smart building micro gridsBattery degradationDemand managementFast resampled iterative filteringGreylag goose optimizationPrairie dog optimizationRelational bi-level aggregation graph convolutional network

Identifiers

PMID41593174
PMCPMC12909795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.