Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41593167›Full record

ArticleCommunications medicine2026

Leveraging machine learning for digital gait analysis in ataxia using sensor-free motion capture.

Philipp Wegner, Marcus Grobe-Einsler, Lara Reimer, Fabian Kahl, Berkan Koyak, Tim Elter, Alexander Lange, Okka Kimmich, Daniel Soub, Felix Hufschmidt and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Philipp WegnerGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany. philipp.wegner@dzne.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1159-9269
Marcus Grobe-EinslerGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany.
Lara ReimerInstitute for Digital Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6546-8531
Fabian KahlInstitute for Digital Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-2741-2611
Berkan KoyakGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany.
Tim ElterCenter for Neurology, Deptment of Parkinson's Disease, Sleep and Movement Disorders, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Alexander LangeGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany.
Okka KimmichGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany.
Daniel SoubGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany.
Felix HufschmidtGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany.
Sarah BernsenGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany.
Mónica FerreiraGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-2844-8850
Thomas KlockgetherGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6174-5442
Jennifer FaberGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3265-0262

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGait disturbances are the clinical hallmark of ataxia. Their severity is assessed within a well-established clinical scale, which only allows coarse scoring and does not reflect the complexity of individual gait deterioration. We investigated whether sensor-free motion capture enables to replicate clinical scoring and improve the assessment of gait disturbances.

methodsThe normal walking task during clinical assessment was videotaped in 91 ataxia patients and 28 healthy controls. A full-body pose estimation model (AlphaPose) was used to extract positions, distances, and angles over time while walking. The resulting time series were analyzed with four machine learning (ML) models, which were combinations of feature extraction (tsfresh, ROCKET) and prediction methods (XGBoost, Ridge). First, in a regression and classification approach, we trained the ML models on reconstructing the clinical score. Second, we used explainable AI (SHAP) to identify the most important time series. Third, we investigated time series features to study longitudinal changes.

resultsGait disturbances are assessed with high accuracy by ML models, slightly improving human rating (i) in the categorial prediction of the clinical score (F1-score best model: 63.99%, human: 60.57% F1-score), (ii) in the detection of subtle changes (pre-symptomatic patients, clinically rated unimpaired are differentiated from HC with a F1-score of 75.96%) and (iii) in the detection of longitudinal changes over time (Pearson's correlation coefficient model: -0.626, p < 0.01; human: -0.060, not significant).

conclusionsML-based analysis shows improved sensitivity in assessing gait disturbances in ataxia. Subtle and longitudinal changes can be captured within this study. These findings suggest that such approaches may hold promise as potential outcome parameters for early interventions, therapy monitoring, and home-based assessments.

Identifiers

PMID41593167
PMCPMC13031521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.