ArticleScientific reports2026
Fabrication of cation exchange sponges based on melamine-formaldehyde sponges.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The development of efficient and reusable cation exchange materials is essential for water purification and ion extraction processes. This study introduces innovative cation-exchange sponges fabricated using a melamine-formaldehyde (MF) sponge as a support. The sponge was dip-coated in a solution of polystyrene in dichloromethane and subsequently sulfonated under controlled temperature and time. Results demonstrated that a polystyrene concentration of 10% (w/v) with sulfonation at 40 °C for 2 h yielded a cation-exchange capacity (CEC) of 1.07 meq/g, beyond which performance declined due to pore blockage. Extending the sulfonation duration to 3 h increased the CEC to 1.27 meq/g, while a longer duration (4 h) caused a slight decrease attributable to polymer degradation. Response Surface Methodology (RSM) was employed to systematically optimize the process parameters, leading to a maximum CEC of 1.45 meq/g under ideal conditions (47 °C for 3.5 h). Structural characterization via SEM and FTIR confirmed that the enhanced porosity provided a greater surface area and improved access for ion diffusion, while the incorporated sulfonic acid groups served as the primary cation exchange sites. This synergistic effect between the optimized structure and tailored chemistry was directly responsible for the high CEC achieved. The sponge's monolithic, open-pore structure facilitates easy handling and eliminates clogging and high-pressure drops associated with granular resins. This unique combination of high capacity, straightforward fabrication, and excellent hydrodynamic performance positions this material as a highly promising candidate for next-generation water treatment technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.