ArticleScientific reports2026
Urine volatile organic compounds (VOCs) combined with machine learning algorithm in the diagnosis of gallstones with cholecystitis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To evaluate the noninvasive, early identification capability of urine volatile organic compounds (VOCs) obtained via gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry (GC-IMS), combined with machine learning models, for gallstones complicated by cholecystitis. A single-center study enrolled 100 patients with gallstone-cholecystitis and 100 healthy controls (n = 200 total). Midstream urine samples were uniformly collected and stored at − 80 °C. GC-IMS acquired two-dimensional fingerprints, which underwent RIP normalization and manual peak quality control. Unreliably identified peaks were excluded before modeling. The data were randomly divided into training (70%) and testing (30%) sets. Feature selection was performed on the training set to construct Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Neural Network (NN), and Decision Tree (DT) models. These models were optimized using 10-fold cross-validation and evaluated on the testing set, with Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) as the primary metric. Simultaneously, model performance and single biomarker performance are evaluated based on leading compounds (e.g., Linalool, Propyl-propenyl disulphide, Methylthiobutyrate-M, Butylamine). On the test set, RF, SVM, and NN achieved AUC values of 0.905, 0.887, and 0.870 respectively, demonstrating overall superior discrimination compared to DT (AUC = 0.658). For the small model constructed using the aforementioned four VOCs, NN, RF, and SVM yielded AUC values of 0.81, 0.77, and 0.76 respectively; Regarding individual markers, Linalool (AUC = 0.777), Propyl-propenyl disulphide (AUC = 0.768), Methylthiobutyrate-M (AUC = 0.768), and Butylamine (AUC = 0.731) all demonstrated certain discriminatory capabilities. The combination of urine VOCs-GC-IMS with machine learning demonstrates favorable discriminatory performance in the early, non-invasive identification of gallstones and cholecystitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.