ArticleScientific reports2026
Effect of print angle on dimensional accuracy and printing efficiency of directly 3D-printed clear aligners.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluated the effect of print angulation on the dimensional accuracy and production efficiency of directly 3D-printed clear aligners fabricated with a high-resolution LCD printer and a clinically available, FDA-cleared clear resin (Clear Miracle Resin; ODS Co., Ltd., Inchon, Korea). Seventy aligners were produced in seven orientations (0°, A30°, A60°, A90°, P30°, P60°, P90°) with a 50-µm layer height. Dimensional accuracy was assessed using root mean square (RMS) deviation, linear and angular measurements, and height analysis complemented by color-coded deviation maps. Printing time was also recorded. Statistical comparisons were performed using the Kruskal–Wallis test with post-hoc analysis at a significance level of 0.05. Print angulation significantly influenced RMS as well as linear, angular, and height deviations. The 0° orientation achieved the lowest RMS and the shortest print time, while A90° and P90° showed higher deviations and greater vertical reduction. All groups exhibited negative height deviations, with the 0°, P30°, and P60° orientations demonstrating minimal deviations. These findings indicate that print angulation measurably affects both accuracy and efficiency of direct aligner printing. The 0° orientation provided the most accurate fit, fastest production, and good predictability, underscoring the importance of angulation selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.