ArticleScientific reports2026
A cross-sectional study exploring academic motivation among rehabilitation science students under different teaching approaches in China.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chinese-foreign cooperative programs are increasingly important in rehabilitation education in mainland China. This study examined the academic motivation of final-year rehabilitation students and the associated factors, including teaching approach, gender, specific interests, and sleep habits. A cross-sectional online survey was conducted at Changsha Social Work College, including students from both domestic and cooperative programs. Academic motivation was assessed using the Academic Motivation Scale-College version in Chinese. In total, 79 domestic students and 32 cooperative students provided valid responses. A higher proportion of students in the cooperative program reported having specific interests (81.3% vs. 48.1%, χ² = 10.25, p < 0.01), whereas a lower proportion reported regular nap habits (53.1% vs. 75.9%, χ² = 5.58, p < 0.05) compared with students in the domestic program. Cooperative students had higher Self-Determined Index (SDI) scores than domestic students (6.38 ± 4.84 vs. 3.34 ± 4.43, T = 3.18, p < 0.01). Students with specific interests also had higher SDI scores (5.60 ± 4.74 vs. 2.33 ± 4.07, T = 3.81, p < 0.01). Multiple linear regression analysis indicated that the cooperative program (B = 2.11, 95% CI: 0.16 to 4.11, p < 0.05) and having specific interests (B = 2.69, 95% CI: 0.90 to 4.49, p < 0.01) were significantly associated with higher academic motivation. Gender, BMI, and sleep habits were not significantly associated with SDI scores.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.