ArticleScientific reports2026
Factors determining survival in oligometastatic breast cancer in a retrospective cohort study from a low and middle income country.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metastatic breast cancer has historically had a poor prognosis, but oligometastatic breast cancer shows differing outcomes. We analyzed the factors affecting 5-year survival for patients undergoing upfront resection. We conducted a 10-year chart review from a tertiary referral hospital. Patients were followed for at least 5 years after surgery. Overall and progression free survival were calculated from date of surgery using cox-proportional hazards while logistic regression was used to evaluate the pre- and post-operative factors associated with surgery. 55 patients with a mean age of 50.4 years were included. Most patients had T4, N1/N2 stage disease on presentation. The most common site of metastasis was lungs. The median overall survival was 111 months with a 5-year survival rate of 64.6% (47.9%, 77.2%). There were 18 distant and 1 local recurrence and 20 deaths in our cohort leading to a median progression free survival of 36 months. N2 nodal disease, and liver metastasis were identified as poor prognostic markers while hormone receptors increased survival (p < 0.05), while locally advanced disease and triple positive tumor biology increased the risk of progression and death (p < 0.05). Patients with limited metastatic disease should be considered for upfront resection with the intent to cure, especially when triple positive tumor biology is present.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.