Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41593113›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Factors determining survival in oligometastatic breast cancer in a retrospective cohort study from a low and middle income country.

Kulsoom Shaikh, Muhammad Uzair, Lubna Mushtaq Vohra, Sakina Abidi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kulsoom ShaikhSection of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Muhammad UzairMedical College, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Lubna Mushtaq VohraSection of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan. lubna.vohra@aku.edu.
Sakina AbidiConsultant Breast Surgeon, Patel Hospital Karachi, Karachi, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metastatic breast cancer has historically had a poor prognosis, but oligometastatic breast cancer shows differing outcomes. We analyzed the factors affecting 5-year survival for patients undergoing upfront resection. We conducted a 10-year chart review from a tertiary referral hospital. Patients were followed for at least 5 years after surgery. Overall and progression free survival were calculated from date of surgery using cox-proportional hazards while logistic regression was used to evaluate the pre- and post-operative factors associated with surgery. 55 patients with a mean age of 50.4 years were included. Most patients had T4, N1/N2 stage disease on presentation. The most common site of metastasis was lungs. The median overall survival was 111 months with a 5-year survival rate of 64.6% (47.9%, 77.2%). There were 18 distant and 1 local recurrence and 20 deaths in our cohort leading to a median progression free survival of 36 months. N2 nodal disease, and liver metastasis were identified as poor prognostic markers while hormone receptors increased survival (p < 0.05), while locally advanced disease and triple positive tumor biology increased the risk of progression and death (p < 0.05). Patients with limited metastatic disease should be considered for upfront resection with the intent to cure, especially when triple positive tumor biology is present.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRetrospective StudiesBreast cancerOligometastaticSurgery

Identifiers

PMID41593113
PMCPMC12852139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.