Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41593105›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

An adaptive, continuous-learning framework for clinical decision-making from proteome-wide biofluid data.

Johannes B Müller-Reif, Vincent Albrecht, Vincenth Brennsteiner, Jakob M Bader, Peter V Treit, Nicolai J Wewer Albrechtsen, Susanne Pangratz-Führer, Matthias Mann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Johannes B Müller-Reif *Department of Proteomics and Signal Transduction, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany. jomueller@biochem.mpg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3454-2396
Vincent Albrecht *Department of Proteomics and Signal Transduction, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-1985-7733
Vincenth BrennsteinerDepartment of Proteomics and Signal Transduction, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany.
Jakob M BaderDepartment of Proteomics and Signal Transduction, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6575-0609
Peter V TreitDepartment of Proteomics and Signal Transduction, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5264-5877
Nicolai J Wewer AlbrechtsenDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4230-5753
Susanne Pangratz-FührerDepartment of Pediatrics, Dr. von Hauner Children's Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5846-9675
Matthias MannDepartment of Proteomics and Signal Transduction, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany. mmann@biochem.mpg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1292-4799

Funding

Novo Nordisk Fonden (Novo Nordisk Foundation) NNF14CC0001Novo Nordisk Fonden (Novo Nordisk Foundation) NNF15CC0001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics provides deep molecular insights from patient samples, but clinical use has been limited by missing values, static biomarker panels, and the need for targeted assay development. We present a framework - Adaptive Diagnostic Architecture for Personalized Testing by Mass Spectrometry (ADAPT-MS) - that enables direct diagnostic and prognostic interpretation of discovery-mode proteomics data at the level of individual samples. ADAPT-MS dynamically retrains simple, robust classifiers based on the proteins quantified in each sample, eliminating the need for imputation or fixed panels. Applied to plasma and cerebrospinal fluid datasets across diseases and clinical centers, it achieves high performance and generalizability using robust, transparent and generalizable statistical models. A single proteomic measurement can support multiple diagnostic questions via retrospective cohort matching, with each classification taking only seconds. As population-scale proteomics datasets grow, this approach lays the foundation for scalable, real-time, and personalized diagnostics directly from proteome-wide data. Such a community effort may help to transform discovery proteomics into a routine clinical tool.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingProteomeProteomicsBiomarkersHumansMass SpectrometryBiomarkersProteome

Identifiers

PMID41593105
PMCPMC12852910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.