ArticleNPJ vaccines2026
Comparative evaluation of 5 combination adjuvants on immunogenicity and efficacy of approved seasonal influenza vaccines.
Article in NPJ vaccines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vaccine Adjuvants and Delivery Systems: A Comprehensive Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Influenza mRNA vaccine with engineered panhandle-forming UTRs provides potent, dose-sparing protection against seasonal influenza viruses.NPJ vaccines · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The benefits of adjuvants for enhancing vaccine immunogenicity and efficacy are well known. Numerous novel adjuvants are at advanced levels of characterization, including some in clinical trials. However, understanding the relative benefits of each is hindered by a lack of comparative studies between adjuvants within the same study. To address this, we have performed a side-by-side comparison of 5 novel combination adjuvants (Alhydroxyquim-II, T-VANT, TRAC-478, IVAX-1 and IVAX-3) by formulating each with two approved seasonal influenza vaccines, Flublok® and Fluzone HD®, and assessing immunogenicity and efficacy in female and male C57Bl/6 mice. Although all tested adjuvants were immunogenic and protective against H1N1 challenge, T-VANT, TRAC-478 and IVAX-1 and -3 were associated with systemic inflammatory cytokines and robust Th1 responses, while Alhydroxyquim-II elicited lower levels of inflammatory cytokines and a Th2 response. Greater morbidity after challenge was also detected in males compared to females. Side-by-side comparisons of existing and novel adjuvants with the same antigen and model system will help inform rational adjuvant selection and guide vaccine development for influenza and other infectious diseases.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.