ArticleInternational journal of spine surgery2026
Assessment of Static Pelvic Parameters According to Ethnicity: Cohort Analysis of 500 Computed Tomography Scans.
Article in International journal of spine surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPelvic incidence (PI) is often used to predict ideal lumbar lordosis in an individual. To date, no study has considered the potential influence of Māori ethnicity (Māori are the indigenous people of New Zealand). Identifying variation in key surgical measurements may aid in reducing health care inequities. The aim of this study was to compare static pelvic parameters according to ethnicity from a New Zealand cohort.
methodsA total of 500 computed tomography scans obtained for major trauma assessment were analyzed, and static pelvic parameters were measured, including PI, pelvisacral angle, femorosacral pelvic angle, sacropelvic angle, sacral table angle, sacral anatomic orientation, pelvic thickness, and L5 segmental angle. Analysis was performed comparing age, gender, and ethnicity cohorts.
resultsThe mean age of the entire cohort was 42.6 years (SD 18.7). There were 323 men (65%). Only the L5 segmental lordosis differed significantly between the genders. Among the cohort, 287 indicated they were New Zealand European (NZE), 159 Māori, 20 Pacifica, and 34 "Other." Age differences were present between the predominant ethnic groups NZE and Māori (6.95 years;
conclusionsIn this first large-scale analysis from New Zealand including Māori, significant differences in a majority of parameters are evident. This reflects significant variation in pelvic morphology and possible differences in normal spinal alignment that should now be a focus of future studies. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Pelvic morphology in Māori differs from that of non-Māori. Efforts are needed to establish normative values in Māori and thus reduce health care inequities. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.