ArticleLupus science & medicine2026
Real-world experience with belimumab-based triple therapy in proliferative lupus nephritis: data from the BEL-SPAIN Registry.
Article in Lupus science & medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanism-informed combination therapy and dynamic risk stratification in lupus nephritis: toward durable renal protection.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Review
- Refractory lupus nephritis: national multicenter study.Internal and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Glucocorticoid tapering and clinical outcomes during belimumab treatment in systemic lupus erythematosus: a retrospective real-world cohort study with exploratory renal analyses.BMC rheumatology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy, safety and predictive factors of belimumab (BEL)-based triple therapy in proliferative lupus nephritis (LN) in real-world settings.
methodsWe conducted a multicentre, retrospective study including patients with proliferative LN (new-onset or relapsing) who initiated BEL within 6 months of a renal flare, in combination with standard-of-care.
results49 patients were included (mean age 37 years; 85.7% female; 67.3% Caucasian). The median time from renal flare to BEL initiation was 1 month (IQR 0-3). By 12 months, 67.3% achieved complete renal response (CRR), 75.5% primary efficacy renal response (PERR) and 83.7% at least partial renal response. Median proteinuria declined from 2.7 g/day to 0.49 g/day, with parallel improvement in estimated glomerular filtration rate (71 to 78 mL/min/1.73 m²). Patients with baseline proteinuria <3 g/day achieved significantly higher CRR (78.1% vs 47.1%; p=0.027) and PERR (84.4% vs 58.8%; p=0.048) rates.The mean glucocorticoid (GC) dose decreased from 31.7 mg/day at baseline to 3.5 mg/day at 12 months, and 26.1% of patients achieved complete GC withdrawal. Extrarenal disease activity was present in 81.6% of patients at baseline, predominantly articular and mucocutaneous, with clinically meaningful improvement in 80% during follow-up. At 12 months, 40.8% met remission by Definition Of Remission In Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (DORIS) criteria and 46.9% attained Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS). Renal treatment failure occurred in 16.3% and renal relapse in 4.1%. Adverse events were mild, and no serious BEL-related events were observed.
conclusionBEL-based triple therapy is effective and safe in proliferative LN, achieving high renal and extrarenal response rates, substantial GC-sparing and treat-to-target outcomes in real-world practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.