ReviewBMJ open respiratory research2026
Impulse oscillometry and traditional pulmonary function testing: correlation, advances and clinical implications.
Review in BMJ open respiratory research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Post-Tuberculosis Lung Disease: Clinicopathologic Insights, Diagnosis, Prevention, and Management.MedComm · 2026Review
- Impulse Oscillometry for Pulmonary Function Evaluation in Children with Neuromuscular Disease: A Comparative Study with Spirometry - Correspondence.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Pulmonary Function in Parkinson's Disease: A Comparative Study of Spirometry and Impulse Oscillometry.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- From FEVJournal of asthma and allergy · 2026Review
- Small airway dysfunction: a shared, early, measurable, and potentially treatable trait across COPD, asthma, and fibrotic lung disease.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Impulse oscillometry system (IOS) is an effort-independent pulmonary function testing technique that assesses respiratory system mechanics during tidal breathing and has gained increasing interest as a complementary modality to traditional pulmonary function tests (PFTs), while its physiological relevance and clinical role alongside conventional tests remain incompletely defined. This narrative literature review synthesises evidence on the correlations between IOS parameters and traditional PFT indices, summarises clinical applications across major chronic respiratory diseases, and discusses emerging developments including artificial intelligence-based approaches; the review is based on studies published since 2010 that compare IOS with spirometry, body plethysmography, and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma, and interstitial lung disease (ILD). Correlation studies indicate that IOS resistance-related parameters are more closely associated with obstructive ventilatory impairment, particularly in COPD and asthma, whereas reactance-related parameters show stronger associations with restrictive ventilatory abnormalities, lung volumes, and diffusion impairment, especially in ILD. Across disease entities, R5-20 and resonant frequency consistently demonstrate higher sensitivity for detecting small airway dysfunction. Clinically, IOS provides value in assessing bronchodilator responsiveness, evaluating asthma control, detecting small airway involvement when spirometry is preserved, and monitoring exposure-related airway effects. Artificial intelligence-based models integrating multidimensional IOS data further highlight its potential in disease screening and classification. Overall, IOS provides complementary physiological and clinical information beyond traditional PFTs, and further large-scale, multicentre studies and methodological standardisation are needed to support its broader clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.