Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41592863›Full record

ArticleBMJ open quality2026

Cultural transformation beyond checklists for patient safety: a longitudinal evaluation of safety interventions in critical care.

Alessio Caccioppola, Lucia Villa, Irene Zainaghi, Matteo Brioni, Veronica Rossi, Emilia Privitera, Paolo Properzi, Sara Leoni, Paola Roselli, Andrea Cislaghi and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open quality, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Alessio Caccioppola *Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Emergency, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy alessio.caccioppola@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1936-3111
Lucia Villa *Department of Healthcare Professions, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Irene ZainaghiDepartment of Healthcare Professions, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Matteo BrioniDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Emergency, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Veronica RossiDepartment of Healthcare Professions, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Emilia PriviteraDepartment of Healthcare Professions, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Paolo ProperziDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Emergency, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Sara LeoniDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Emergency, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Paola RoselliDepartment of Healthcare Professions, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Andrea CislaghiDepartment of Healthcare Professions, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Ileana AdaminiDepartment of Healthcare Professions, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Giacomo GrasselliDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Emergency, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Mauro PanigadaDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Emergency, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImplementing structured safety interventions in intensive care units (ICUs) remains challenging due to patient complexity, staff turnover and dynamic workflows. This study evaluates the longitudinal impact of a multidisciplinary safety improvement programme in a high-acuity ICU.

methodsA 2-year prospective evaluation was conducted in a 12-bed academic ICU in Milan, Italy. The Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture was administered to all ICU professionals (physicians, nurses, physiotherapists) in December 2022 and repeated in December 2024. Interventions included staff training, enhanced event reporting systems, regular morbidity and mortality conferences and a multidisciplinary safety team. Responses were analysed descriptively, including subgroup analysis by professional category and staff turnover.

resultsA total of 86 staff completed the 2022 survey, and 66 completed the 2024 survey, with 56 participating in both. Over the 2 years, perceptions of teamwork (68%-81%), communication openness (47%-60%) and comfort in reporting errors (38%-55%) showed substantial improvement. The proportion of staff who perceived management support for safety increased from 70%-80%. Staff hired after 2022 reported more favourable safety perceptions than continuing staff, particularly in communication and reporting domains.

conclusionsStructured, multidisciplinary interventions led to measurable improvements in ICU safety culture. However, persistent interprofessional differences and under-reporting of adverse events highlight the need for targeted strategies. Safety culture transformation requires sustained leadership, continuous onboarding and system-focused feedback mechanisms to ensure long-term impact.

Indexed as

ChecklistCritical CarePatient SafetySafety ManagementHumansIntensive Care UnitsItalyLongitudinal StudiesOrganizational CultureProspective StudiesQuality ImprovementSurveys and QuestionnairesCritical carePatient safetyQuality improvementSafety cultureTeamwork

Identifiers

PMID41592863
PMCPMC12853527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.