Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41592830›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Direct, indirect and intangible costs incurred by leptospirosis patients: the magnitude, aspects and methods of assessing the costs - a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.

Manojika Subhashi Jayasinghe, Janith Warnasekara, Sajan Praveena Gunarathna, Nuwan Darshana Wickramasinghe, Suneth Agampodi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Manojika Subhashi JayasingheDepartment of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Allied Sciences, Rajarata University of Sri Lanka, Saliyapura, Sri Lanka jpmsjayasinghe@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-9222-7360
Janith WarnasekaraDepartment of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Allied Sciences, Rajarata University of Sri Lanka, Saliyapura, Sri Lanka.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6554-6851
Sajan Praveena GunarathnaDepartment of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Allied Sciences, Rajarata University of Sri Lanka, Saliyapura, Sri Lanka.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0721-598X
Nuwan Darshana WickramasingheDepartment of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Allied Sciences, Rajarata University of Sri Lanka, Saliyapura, Sri Lanka.
Suneth AgampodiDepartment of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Allied Sciences, Rajarata University of Sri Lanka, Saliyapura, Sri Lanka.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7810-1774

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLeptospirosis is a significant public health concern worldwide, as it imposes a substantial economic burden on the global economy. Despite a comprehensive search of the relevant literature, few studies evaluating the economic burden experienced by leptospirosis patients were identified. In particular, very few studies thoroughly examined the cost components, including direct, indirect and intangible costs. This paucity of evidence further motivates the need to conduct a more focused search using a systematic review approach. Thus, this study aims to systematically review the global literature on the magnitude and aspects of the direct, indirect and intangible costs incurred by leptospirosis patients and the methods available for assessing these costs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This review will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols 2015 guidelines. The Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, Study Design framework was used to develop the review questions. The search strategy will comprise two key term blocks: 'Leptospirosis' and 'Economic cost'. A comprehensive literature search will be conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, MEDLINE, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, EconStor and IDEAS to collect publications from inception to July 2025. The search will be limited only to English-language and peer-reviewed publications. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool will be used to assess the quality of eligible studies. Extracted cost data will be categorised into direct, indirect and intangible costs. A meta-analysis will be conducted to quantify the magnitude of these costs if sufficient methodological and contextual homogeneity exists. Moreover, a narrative synthesis will be performed to analyse the qualitative data related to intangible costs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As this study will use secondary data, ethical approval is not required. The systematic review's findings will be published in a scientific journal and presented at relevant conferences to address the knowledge gap regarding the economic burden (including direct, indirect and intangible costs) faced by leptospirosis patients. The results of this systematic review will guide policies for prioritising prevention, improving surveillance and efficiently allocating resources to control leptospirosis. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD 42024585056.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessHealth Care CostsLeptospirosisHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicResearch DesignSystematic Reviews as TopicHEALTH ECONOMICSMeta-AnalysisPublic health

Identifiers

PMID41592830
PMCPMC12853432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.