ArticlePerspectives on sexual and reproductive health2026
An Exploration of the Views and Perspectives of Australian Trans and Gender Diverse Individuals About Transvaginal Ultrasound.
Article in Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTransvaginal ultrasound (TVS) is used routinely in gynecological care in Australia to manage gynecological health concerns. Typically, TVS is well tolerated by patients, with low levels of discomfort reported. Trans and gender diverse people assigned female at birth may experience gender dysphoria or testosterone-related anatomical changes, which could make such intimate examinations physically difficult or emotionally distressing. However, to date, no studies have considered the impact of gender identity on individuals' experiences of TVS. To fill this research gap, we explored the experiences of TVS among trans and gender diverse individuals assigned female at birth within Australia.
methodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with trans and gender diverse individuals assigned female at birth who have experienced TVS in Australia. We analyzed all interviews in line with Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis.
resultsTen trans and gender diverse individuals aged between 18 and 50 years old participated in this study. From their interviews, we developed three overarching themes: (1) It's a bit like being a detective, (2) So I could properly say, "I don't want this done," and (3) I definitely felt like a novelty. Participants described a range of positive and negative experiences with TVS, with issues related to cisnormativity in documentation, staff attitudes, and inadequate informed consent consistently highlighted.
conclusionTrans and gender diverse people face challenges in accessing inclusive gynecological care in Australia. Our findings highlight a need for improved informed consent guidelines, better education and training for health professionals, and more inclusive clinic documentation to promote inclusive care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.