Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41592241›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2026

The effects of shade on cattle mobility, behavior, and dark cutting during lairage at a commercial slaughter facility in the United States.

Lauren Dean, Paxton Sullivan, Lacey Alexander, Robert J Delmore, Lily Edwards-Callaway

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lauren DeanDepartment of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, United States.
Paxton SullivanDepartment of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7715-2828
Lacey AlexanderCargill Protein Headquarters, 825 E Douglas Ave, Wichita, KS 67202, United States.
Robert J DelmoreDepartment of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, United States.
Lily Edwards-CallawayDepartment of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0737-9899

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Time at the slaughter plant during the preslaughter phase is a critical period in livestock production. Although time spent in this phase is relatively short, it can significantly impact cattle comfort and welfare. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of shade during lairage on cattle mobility, behavior, and dark cutting at a commercial slaughter facility. Two shaded (148.6 m2 of 70% shade cloth) and two non-shaded pens were treatment pens. One hundred forty-two groups of cattle were included in the study between May and October 2023. Cattle mobility was scored using the Meat Institute's four-point scale (1 = normal to 4 = extremely reluctant to move) as animals both entered and exited their lairage pen. Video footage of cattle during lairage was evaluated using instantaneous scan sampling with a 5-minute interval to quantify lying, standing, drinking, and motion. The frequency of mounting was also evaluated using behavior sampling during the entire lairage period. Treatment, time in lairage, and space allowance were predictor variables for all behavior outcomes; treatment, sex, weight, space allowance, and temperature humidity index (THI) were predictor variables for dark cutting. There was no impact of shade on behavior and quality outcomes (P > 0.05). An increase in lairage duration was associated with an increased odds of cattle lying down (OR: 1.0064, 95% CI: 1.0057, 1.0071, P < 0.0001) and decreased odds of cattle motion (OR: 0.9937, 95% CI: 0.9889, 0.9979, P = 0.0057). An increase in space allowance was associated with an increased odds of cattle lying down (OR: 1.9112, 95% CI: 1.6012, 2.2693, P < 0.0001), decreased odds of cattle motion (OR: 0.14, 95% CI: 0.03, 0.48, P = 0.0078), and increased odds of dark cutting (OR: 2.51, 95% CI: 1.80, 3.44, P < 0.0001). An increase of THI was associated with decreased odds of dark cutting (OR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.92, 0.99, P = 0.0189). All steer pen groups were associated with decreased odds of dark cutting (OR: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.22, 0.70, P = 0.0017). A survey was also conducted with plant employees to provide insight to their perspectives on the use of shade in lairage (n = 13). The majority (84.6%) of employees agreed that shade should be used in holding pens. While shade was not found to impact measured outcomes, this study provided important insight on how lairage environments influence cattle welfare.

Indexed as

AbattoirsAnimal HusbandryBehavior, AnimalHousing, AnimalAnimalsAnimal WelfareCattleFemaleMaleUnited Statescattle comfortheat mitigationlairagemeat qualitysurveywelfare

Identifiers

PMID41592241
PMCPMC12950284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.