ArticlePloS one2026
Exploring innovative G-CSF schedules in AML cytarabine-based consolidation through a digital twin study of white blood cell recovery.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence for Personalized Management of Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are at high risk for life-threatening infectious complications due to chemotherapy-induced leukopenia. In contrast to other malignancies, prophylactic administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF) is not routinely done in AML. However, recently, clinical trials showed that administration of G-CSF post consolidation chemotherapy leads to faster white blood cell (WBC) recovery and to fewer infections. We investigated novel G-CSF schedules using a mathematical model trained with retrospective clinical data (digital twins) consisting of high-frequency measurements of 65 patients. We evaluated 323 different treatments varying in start and duration of G-CSF administration by examining the impact on the occurrence and duration of leukopenia. For each treatment, we used the same 65 digital twins, plus an additional 100 artificial patients for uncertainty quantification, receiving 3 consolidation cycles each. We lumped the 323 treatments into 4 clusters: NO-G-CSF, PRE-G-CSF, SIM-G-CSF, and POST-G-CSF for schedules without G-CSF, that terminated G-CSF before consolidation chemotherapy started, that overlapped on at least one day, and that started post chemotherapy, respectively. The numerical simulations resulted in substantial differences in the occurrence of leukopenia: 88% of all consolidation cycles with leukopenia for NO-G-CSF, 98% for SIM-G-CSF, 45% for POST-G-CSF, and 28% for PRE-G-CSF. Administration of G-CSF before chemotherapy may thus significantly enhance the efficacy of AML consolidation therapy and, therefore, warrants clinical investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.