Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41592131›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

CCMIM: Optimizing concrete defect detection through state-space modeling and dynamic feature fusion.

Xiaozhen Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Xiaozhen LiArchitectural Engineering Institute, Jinhua University of Vocational Technology, Jinhua, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9983-933X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Concrete defect detection is crucial to the safety, reliability, and durability of structures. For CNN models, it is impossible to obtain all information at different scales and complex backgrounds, nor can it capture all contexts globally. Transformer-based models are computationally intensive, making it difficult to generalize to real-time detection tasks. To address these issues, we propose a novel end-to-end concrete crack detection framework: Concrete Crack Mamba-in-Mamba (CCMIM). Specifically, we introduce the Mamba-In-Mamba (MiM) module to capture long-range dependencies and global context to improve the concrete defect detection capability based on hierarchical data flow. In addition, this paper also proposes the Dynamic Dual Fusion (DDF) module, which enhances the robustness and adaptability of the model and achieves smooth multi-scale fusion by dynamically changing the feature representation. To reduce the computational cost and maintain spatial information, we propose the Sparse Pyramid Transformer (SPT) module. This module reduces the computation and improves the inference speed by selecting tokens level by level (from coarse to fine) and sharing attention parameters, but does not sacrifice accuracy. Experimental results show that the CCMIM model outperforms traditional methods as well as YOLO- and Transformer-based models in small crack detection across multiple datasets. Specifically, on the RDD2022, SDNET2018, and CCCD datasets, the accuracy reached 89.2%, 85.2%, and 79.3%, respectively, while the mAP50 reached 88.1%, 87.8%, and 79.2%. In summary, the CCMIM model provides an effective solution for concrete defect detection. The code can be accessed at: https://github.com/lixiaozhen01/CCMIM.

Indexed as

Construction MaterialsModels, TheoreticalAlgorithmsConvolutional Neural NetworksDetection Algorithms

Identifiers

PMID41592131
PMCPMC12844529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.