Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41592130›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2026

Hierarchical analysis of RNA secondary structures with pseudoknots based on sections.

Ryota Masuki, Donn Liew, Ee Hou Yong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ryota MasukiDepartment of Physics, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Donn LiewDivision of Physics and Applied Physics, School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Ee Hou YongDivision of Physics and Applied Physics, School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4583-4071

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predicting RNA structures containing pseudoknots remains computationally challenging due to high processing costs and complexity. While standard methods for pseudoknot prediction require O(N6) time complexity, we present a hierarchical approach that significantly reduces computational cost while maintaining prediction accuracy. Our method analyzes RNA structures by dividing them into contiguous regions of unpaired bases ("sections") derived from known secondary structures. We examine pseudoknot interactions between sections using a nearest-neighbor energy model with dynamic programming. Our algorithm scales as [Formula: see text], offering substantial computational advantages over existing global prediction methods. Analysis of 726 transfer messenger RNA and 454 Ribonuclease P RNA sequences reveals that biologically relevant pseudoknots are highly concentrated among section pairs with large minimum free energy (MFE) gain. Over 90% of connected section pairs appear within just the top 3% of section pairs ranked by MFE gain. For 2-clusters, our method achieves high prediction accuracy with sensitivity exceeding 0.9 and positive predictive value above 0.8. For 3-clusters, we discovered asymmetric behavior where "former" section pairs (formed early in the sequence) are predicted accurately, while "latter" section pairs do not follow local energy predictions. This asymmetry suggests that complex pseudoknot formation follows sequential co-transcriptional folding rather than global energy minimization, providing insights into RNA folding dynamics.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyNucleic Acid ConformationRNASequence Analysis, RNAAlgorithmsBase SequenceModels, MolecularRNA

Identifiers

PMID41592130
PMCPMC12858078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.