ArticlePloS one2026
Differential impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on sociodemographic groups: A mathematical model framework.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deprivation and age can both drive disparities in infectious disease transmission and outcomes; however, few models capture their combined effects. We developed a deterministic ordinary differential equation model stratified by age and deprivation decile coupled with time-dependent testing proportion to examine how mixing patterns shape inequalities in disease burden, using COVID-19 in England as a case study. The framework allows three mixing scenarios-diagonal, preferred, and proportionate, and we simulated the epidemic with movement restrictions to reflect lockdown measures. We assessed the effectiveness of these restrictions in reducing transmission and explored their implications for different social groups. Results show that under diagonal mixing, disease outcomes are significantly higher than under the other mixing scenarios, with the most deprived deciles experiencing disproportionately greater burdens. Lockdown measures substantially reduced overall disease outcomes across all deciles, but relative inequalities persisted, indicating that generalised restrictions alone were insufficient to eliminate these inequalities. Our age-deprivation structured model provides a foundation for designing targeted interventions, such as deprivation-focused testing, vaccination campaigns, or localised movement restrictions, to mitigate unequal health outcomes during epidemics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.