ArticlePloS one2026
Correction of the curve of spee using clear aligner therapy: A finite element analysis of three lower anterior intrusion protocols.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCorrection of the curve of Spee (COS) often requires lower anterior intrusion, which remains one of the least accurate tooth movements in clear aligner therapy (CAT). This limited accuracy may be influenced by the anchorage system or the design of the intrusion strategy. This study aimed to evaluate the movement trends and stress distribution in the lower anterior teeth subjected to three different intrusion protocols using finite element analysis (FEA).
methodsThree-dimensional models of the mandibular dentition, periodontal ligaments (PDLs), bone, attachments, and clear aligners were constructed using Materialise Mimics and Materialise 3-matic software. The assembly of the anatomical structures was developed using Autodesk Inventor, and FEA was performed using FeBio software. Three protocols with different anterior intrusion designs were evaluated: S1 (simulation 1) - intrusion displacements of 0.25 mm were applied simultaneously to the canines, central, and lateral incisors; S2 (simulation 2) - intrusion displacements of 0.25 mm were applied only to the lateral and central incisors; S3 (simulation 3) - intrusion displacements of 0.25 mm were applied only to the canines. Total displacement, equivalent strain, and the distribution of minimum and maximum principal stresses were analyzed.
resultsSimultaneous intrusion (S1) produced the most balanced movement with the lowest stress in the target teeth and controlled bone displacement. Intruding only the incisors (S2) increased PDL stress and anchorage extrusion but also caused minor canine intrusion, indicating force propagation through the aligner. Canine-only intrusion (S3) elevated stress in the canines and produced slight incisor intrusion. Posterior teeth functioned effectively as anchorage in all simulations.
conclusionSimultaneous intrusion of canines and incisors is the most biomechanically efficient approach for COS correction with aligners, minimizing stress and unwanted side effects. Isolated intrusion of either group requires careful planning to manage secondary movements and anchorage control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.