ArticlePloS one2026
Nutrient gaps are prevalent among women experiencing infertility, a cross-sectional analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), 2013-2020.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdequate nutrient intake is important for supporting reproductive health. Few studies have examined the role of nutrients for fertility among women, resulting in a critical evidence gap. The aim of this study was to explore the usual intake and prevalence of nutrient inadequacies from foods only and foods plus dietary supplements among women of child bearing age with and without infertility.
methodsThis cross-sectional study used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), a national survey in the United States. Participants included women aged 18-44 years from 2013-2020 with or without infertility (difficulty trying to conceive for at least one-year). The mean usual intakes and prevalence of inadequacy (% < EAR/AI) of key nutrients- vitamins A, B1, B2, niacin, B6, B12, C, D, E, K, lycopene, lutein + zeaxanthin, folate, choline, zinc, selenium, iron, calcium, magnesium, EPA and DHA were determined from 24-hr dietary recalls.
resultsWomen aged 18-44 years who reported infertility had significantly lower intakes of vitamin A, E and K and lutein and zeaxanthin from foods and foods + supplements compared to women without infertility. Lower intakes of selenium (foods only, 96.6 ug/d vs 100 ug/d), vitamin C (foods only, 66.9 mg/d vs. 74.2 mg/d) and calcium (foods + dietary supplements, 941 mg/d vs. 974 mg/d) were also observed in women reporting infertility. Fewer women with infertility met nutrient requirements. For example, 21.5% of women with infertility were below the EAR for vitamin B6 versus 14.6% of women without infertility and over 50% of those with infertility were below the EAR/AI for vitamins A, C, E, and magnesium and potassium. Differences in nutrient intakes by fertility status were particularly pronounced for women aged 35-44 years.
conclusionsThese findings suggest lower intake of key nutrients among women with infertility, especially those aged 35-44. Future studies are needed to understand the implications of nutrient gaps for conception. Across all age groups, and fertility status, gaps in nutrients that are important for overall health were evident, underscoring the need for public health strategies to address broad dietary improvements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.