ArticlePloS one2026
Differences between Scaly-sided Merganser (Mergus squamatus) and Common Merganser (M. merganser) feather microstructure.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The microstructural characteristics of feathers are useful for species identification. In this study, scanning electron microscopy was employed to examine the microstructures of contour feathers, rectrices, and down feathers from both the Scaly-sided Merganser (Mergus squamatus) and Common Merganser (Mergus merganser). The primary objective was to assess inter-species differences and evaluate the potential of these microstructural characteristics as reliable indicators for distinguishing species. Several microstructural characteristics of feathers exhibited significant variations between the two species. In rectrices, significant variations were observed in the prong length, base length, hooklet number, and prong number of distal barbules. Similarly, down feathers exhibited marked differences in the node number, distance between nodes, internode width, and barbule length of downy barbules. Stepwise discriminant analysis, combined with the leave-one-out cross-validation test, further validated the discriminatory power of all microstructural characteristics. For contour feathers, incorporating the base length into the model achieved a 56.9% correct classification rate. In rectrices, the hooklet number and prong length emerged as key discriminators, with a correct classification rate of 91.3%. Most notably, the barbule length, node number, and distance between nodes of down feathers demonstrated exceptional discriminative capabilities, attaining a perfect 100% correct classification rate. Consequently, the barbule length, node number, and distance between nodes of down feathers, may serve as potentially useful morphological markers for differentiating the Scaly-sided Merganser from the Common Merganser.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.