Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41592039›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Preparing the next generation of Complex Networks and Systems scientists: Evaluation results for the Complex Networks and Systems NSF research training program at Indiana University.

Michael Ginda, Katy Börner, Olga Scrivner, William Trochim, Luis M Rocha, Selma Šabanović

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michael GindaDepartment of Intelligent Systems Engineering, Luddy School of Informatics, Computing, and Engineering, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7500-8096
Katy BörnerDepartment of Intelligent Systems Engineering, Luddy School of Informatics, Computing, and Engineering, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America.
Olga ScrivnerDepartment of Intelligent Systems Engineering, Luddy School of Informatics, Computing, and Engineering, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America.
William TrochimBrooks School of Public Policy, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.
Luis M RochaSchool of Systems Science and Industrial Engineering, Binghamton University (SUNY), Binghamton, New York, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9402-887X
Selma ŠabanovićDepartment of Informatics, Luddy School of Informatics, Computing, and Engineering, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2553-854X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessing and evaluating programmatic outcomes of graduate education programs help stakeholders understand and respond to challenges that emerge over the course of a complex academic program. Given the increased complexity of program activities and outcomes, there is a need for semi-automatic, interactive visual analytics tools that transform data into actionable insights to inform decision-making. This paper documents the results of the evaluation planning and annual workflow setup to create dynamic assessment reports for the Complex Networks and Systems NSF Research Traineeship (CNS NRT) program at Indiana University. The CNS NRT evaluation workflow relied on institutional, survey, and publication data and the freely available tools to guide decision making and communicate the achievements of faculty and doctoral trainees who participated in the program between 2017 and 2024. The evaluation data to date show that the program is judged by participants as meeting its goals and that there has been considerable evidence of research productivity as indicated in the publication data. These clear gains in short-term outcomes show that the CNS NRT is on a pathway to achieving the medium and longer-term goals of the project, which will be examined over a longer period.

Indexed as

Education, GraduateResearchResearch PersonnelAcademiaHumansIndianaProgram EvaluationUniversities

Identifiers

PMID41592039
PMCPMC12843521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.