Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41592035›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2026

Development and evaluation of machine learning algorithms for the prediction of opioid-related deaths among UK patients with non-cancer pain.

Jose Benitez-Aurioles, Carlos Raul Ramirez Medina, David Jenkins, Niels Peek, Meghna Jani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jose Benitez-AuriolesDivision of Informatics, Imaging and Data Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Carlos Raul Ramirez MedinaCentre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
David JenkinsDivision of Informatics, Imaging and Data Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Niels PeekThe Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6393-9969
Meghna JaniCentre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1487-277X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The global rise in prescription opioid use has contributed to an opioid epidemic, associated harms, and unintentional deaths in several western countries. Opioids however continue to be regularly prescribed for acute pain and in the chronic pain context due to limited treatment options. Currently there are no accurate tools that help predict which patients prescribed opioids may be at risk of death, which depends on the cultural context and varies across countries. Existing models do not account for statistical considerations such as censoring and competing risks. Using nationally representative data from the United Kingdom from 1,026,139 patients newly prescribed an opioid, we developed three competing risk time-to-event models: a regression model, a random forest, and a deep neural network to predict opioid-related deaths using UK primary care records. The models were externally validated in an external cohort of 337,015 patients. The models exhibited good discrimination and positive predictive value during internal validation (C-statistic for the regression model, random forest, and neural network: 84.3%, 84.4% and 82.1% respectively), and external validation (C-statistic for the regression model, random forest, and neural network: 81.8%, 81.5% and 81.5% respectively). Prior substance abuse, lung and liver comorbidities, morphine, fentanyl, or oxycodone at initiation and co-prescription of gabapentinoids were some of candidate predictors associated with a higher risk of opioid-related mortality within the models. These results demonstrate how routinely collected data from a nationally representative dataset may be used to develop and validate opioids risk algorithms to better help clinicians and patients predict risk to this serious adverse outcome.

Identifiers

PMID41592035
PMCPMC12843567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.