Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41592019›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Children's perspectives of their everyday food practices: insights to inform policy and interventions.

Sophie Wright-Pedersen, Helen Vidgen, Danielle Gallegos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sophie Wright-PedersenCentre for Childhood Nutrition Research, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8794-018X
Helen VidgenSchool of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia.
Danielle GallegosCentre for Childhood Nutrition Research, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Children's everyday food practices have a profound impact on their physical, mental, cultural and social health and wellbeing. Grounded in social practice theory, the focus of this paper is the examination of the performance of food practices, rather than the practitioner. This approach supports health promoting efforts to move away from victim blaming and instead explore the intersections between individual, social and structural determinants of food practices. With foundations in the New Sociology of Childhood, this article explores eight- to twelve-year-old children's perspectives of the enablers and constraints to their performances of everyday food practices through a social practice theory lens. Children participated in sequential creative draw-and-tell interviews and Photovoice methods. Through abductive analysis of qualitative data, diverse interlinking configurations of the meanings, materials and competences were attributed by children as either facilitating or constraining food practice performances further impacted by transitioning times, places, social settings and contexts. A case study of food shopping practices was able to present a holistic narrative of how individual, social and structural determinants intertwined across the temporal and spatial dimensions. This study showcases how a social practice led approach that privileges children's voices can be used to inform more holistic, equitable, engaging and effective health policy and practice that endeavour to impact children's routine and habitual food practices.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorChildHumans

Identifiers

PMID41592019
PMCPMC12843533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.