ArticleBrazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier)
Comparative effectiveness of TAP block, EOIP block, and standard care for postoperative analgesia in renal transplantation: a retrospective study.
Article in Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEffective pain management following renal transplantation is crucial. While various regional analgesic techniques have been studied, the optimal approach remains unclear. We compared the additive value of Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) and External Oblique Intercostal Plane (EOIP) blocks to Standard Care (SC) on postoperative pain and opioid consumption.
methodsThis retrospective study included 237 renal transplant recipients (127 SC, 75 TAP, 35 EOIP) between January 2023 and December 2024. Multivariable regression analysis assessed the association of block type on postoperative pain and opioid consumption.
resultsTAP block was associated with significantly lower pain scores than SC during the first eight postoperative hours (5.0 vs. 7.0, p < 0.001). Pre-incision TAP block demonstrated the most significant reduction in both pain scores (β = -2.21, 95% CI -3.38 to -1.05, p < 0.001) and opioid consumption (β = -13.56, 95% CI: -21.59 to -5.52, p = 0.001). EOIP block showed no significant advantages over SC and was associated with higher opioid consumption compared to TAP block.
conclusionPain predominantly manifested in the first eight postoperative hours. TAP block, particularly when administered pre-incision, was associated with superior pain control compared to SC or EOIP block. Living donor recipients experienced significantly higher pain scores regardless of technique, warranting further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.