ArticleJournal of youth and adolescence2026
Dynamic Reciprocal Relationships among Rejection Sensitivity, Cognitive Reappraisal, and Prosocial Behavior in Secondary School Students.
Article in Journal of youth and adolescence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Psychoemotional Profiles in Reading Comprehension Among Students with Typical Development, Learning Disabilities, and Developmental Language Disorder.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Secondary school students often experience concurrent pressures from social interactions and academic demands, leaving them vulnerable to rejection sensitivity. Adaptive strategies such as cognitive reappraisal and prosocial behavior may reduce sensitivity and promote positive social adaptation. A total of 1,214 first-year secondary school students (Mage=15.46, SDage=0.71; 39.30% girls) from eastern China participated in a three-wave longitudinal study conducted at six-month intervals.. Cross-lagged panel models (CLPM) and random-intercept cross-lagged panel models (RI-CLPM) were employed to examine inter-individual stability and intra-individual dynamics. The results showed that, in both models, cognitive reappraisal and prosocial behavior could reduce rejection sensitivity, whereas rejection sensitivity impaired adolescents’ cognitive reappraisal and prosocial behavior. The RI-CLPM model further revealed two key pathways: enhanced prosocial behavior not only promoted cognitive reappraisal by reducing rejection sensitivity, but also reduced rejection sensitivity further by improving cognitive reappraisal. These findings shed light on the risk and protective mechanisms involved in the emotional socialization of secondary school students. They emphasize the malleability of rejection sensitivity and provide a theoretical foundation and practical implications for fostering students’ social and emotional capability and providing psychological support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41591747What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.