ArticleForensic toxicology2026
The combined analysis of hair samples with fly larvae for the forensic identification of skeletonized human remains.
Article in Forensic toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIn the present work, we report the combined use of hair and fly larvae samples as a valuable approach for obtaining additional toxicological evidence in cases of skeletonized corpses. In highly decomposed human remains, the absence of conventional biological specimens (e.g. blood, urine, and organs) requires alternative matrices to base the forensic investigation upon. However, it is challenging to find the most suitable medico-legal approach in these cases.
methodsHair and fly larvae samples were collected from two independent cases and processed by solid phase extraction using a similar procedure. Analyses were performed using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.
resultsTwo anticonvulsants were found in the samples but in a different pattern: phenobarbital in case 1, and phenobarbital in association with phenytoin in case 2.
conclusionsThe results of this toxicological approach combining two different samples, hair and larvae, in addition to circumstantial and autopsy findings, proved to be paramount in the medico-legal assessment of the cases herein described, leading to the successful identification of the subjects by DNA analysis. We thus hope that the approach and findings reported in this work contribute to the growing entomotoxicology science and its applicability to real complex forensic cases, especially considering that, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first article describing the determination of phenytoin in insects for this purpose.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.