ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2026
Automatic detection and measurement system for aortic aneurysms using deep learning-based artificial intelligence.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluated the performance of a deep learning-based artificial intelligence (DLAI) system for detecting fusiform aortic aneurysms and measuring the diameters of the entire aorta on non-contrast CT images.We retrospectively collected 160 non-contrast CT images (130 males, 71.8 ± 9.2 years) to evaluate aortic aneurysms and used them as training data. To evaluate the accuracy of the DLAI system for the automatic detection and measurement of aortic aneurysms, another 190 non-contrast CT images (153 males, 70.7 ± 10.3 years) were collected and used as validation data. First, the accuracy of DLAI results was calculated by referring to the radiology reports. An expert radiologist read the test data again and calculated the final accuracy by referring to the DLAI predictions.Dice scores for aortic segmentation were 0.90, 0.94, 0.93, and 0.84 for the entire aorta, thoracic aorta, abdominal aorta, and iliac artery, respectively. The sensitivity, positive predictive value, and F-measure of the DLAI system for detecting aortic aneurysms were 0.81, 0.83, and 0.82, respectively. Eleven (4.4%) aneurysms were newly identified after the radiologist's second reading based on DLAI predictions. The final accuracy of the DLAI detection increased to 0.83, 0.87, and 0.85 for sensitivity, positive predictive value, and F-measure, respectively. The size error in the measurement of aortic aneurysms between the DLAI system and radiology reports was 0.86 ± 2.72 mm, with a strong correlation (ICCs = 0.97).Our DLAI system was highly accurate in detecting aneurysms and measuring the diameters of the entire aorta on non-contrast CT images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41591618What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.