ArticleUrolithiasis2026
Quantitative analysis and risk factors of high-grade encrustation in double-J stents after ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy.
Article in Urolithiasis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Successful Endourological Management of Encrusted Metallic Ureteral Stents: A Case-Series of Three Patients.Reports (MDPI) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To quantitatively evaluate high-grade encrustation in double-J (DJ) stents and identify its risk factors in patients undergoing ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy. This retrospective study analyzed 56 encrusted DJ stents from patients post-ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy. Encrustation severity was classified using the FECal (Forgotten, Encrusted, Calcified) grading system. Clinical, laboratory, and stent characteristic data were collected. Composition and extent of encrustation were assessed via inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for high-grade encrustation. Among the 56 encrusted stents, FECal grades were: I (n = 23), II (n = 12), III (n = 18), IV (n = 1), and V (n = 2). High-grade encrustation (Grades III-V) was significantly associated with female gender (66.7% vs. 34.3%, p = 0.019), urological stone history (33.3% vs. 5.7%, p = 0.010), and indwelling time > 4 weeks (52.4% vs. 25.7%, p = 0.044). Multivariate analysis confirmed indwelling time > 4 weeks as an independent risk factor (OR = 3.9, p = 0.049). Calcium oxalate was the main component, with encrustation initiating on black-ring areas and near side holes and gradually extending to cross-sectional regions. The FECal grading system effectively reflects encrustation severity. Indwelling time > 4 weeks is a key predictor of high-grade encrustation. Side holes and the black marker ring are high-risk areas for mineral deposition. Developing stents with improved biocompatibility and anti-encrustation coatings could mitigate encrustation risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41591535What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.