ArticleExperimental brain research2026
Reduced cerebral blood flow does not alter concurrent or post-intervention inhibitory control: evidence from a 3-h head-down tilt protocol in healthy young adults.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A transient increase in cerebral blood flow (CBF) via exercise or hypercapnia has-in part-been linked to an executive function (EF) benefit. It is, however, unclear whether a transient reduction in CBF negatively impacts EF. In the present study, healthy young adults (n = 24) completed separate 3-h interventions involving - 12° head-down tilt (HDT) and a control (0°) supine posture. The HDT protocol was used because it induces a cephalad fluid shift that safely and reliably decreases CBF. To estimate CBF, transcranial Doppler ultrasound measured middle cerebral artery velocity (MCAv) at discrete timepoints (i.e., baseline, concurrent with the intervention and recovery) and the Stroop colour-naming task completed at baseline, 30-min intervals throughout the intervention and a recovery timepoint, assessed inhibitory control-based changes in EF. As expected, a time-dependent decrease in MCAv (8%) was observed in the HDT but not the control intervention; however, frequentist and Bayesian statistics demonstrated that Stroop performance metrics were not associated with the MCAv change (ps > 0.12). Instead, time-dependent deficits in Stroop task performance were associated with increased ratings of mental fatigue-a result observed across HDT and control interventions. Accordingly, a reduction in MCAv during a 3-h HDT intervention did not impact an inhibitory control measure of EF and our findings demonstrates neurocognitive resilience during a short-term reduction in CBF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41591488What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.