SynthesisInternational archives of occupational and environmental health2026
Systematic review update of organisational-level mental health promotion interventions: evidence from healthcare, construction, and telework-based mobile work settings.
Synthesis in International archives of occupational and environmental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis systematic review evaluates the effectiveness of organisational-level mental health promotion interventions in healthcare, construction, and Telework and ICT-based Mobile (TICTM) work, focusing on burnout, depression, anxiety, stress, and overall mental well-being.
methodsFollowing PRISMA 2020 guidelines and registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024541652), we searched PubMed Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, and EBSCOHost Medline. Studies were included if they assessed organisational-level interventions targeting mental health outcomes, used quantitative methods with control groups, and applied validated measurement tools. Eligible publications were those appearing between 10 July 2021 and 30 June 2024 for healthcare and 17 May 2022 and 30 June 2024 for construction, reflecting the cut-off dates of our previous reviews, and between 1 January 2014 and 30 June 2024 for TICTM. Included studies were appraised for quality using the Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies (QATQS), and findings were synthesised using a narrative synthesis approach.
resultsSix controlled trials (four randomised, two non-randomised) met the inclusion criteria. The four healthcare-sector studies each reported significant improvements in at least one primary mental health outcome-burnout, depression, or stress. The construction-sector study found a short-term reduction in stress at 12 months, but this was not sustained at 24 months. The single TICTM study reported improvements in positive affect, a component of psychological well-being.
conclusionThis update confirmed our previous findings, showing that evidence on organisational-level interventions remains strongest in healthcare, where most studies reported improvements in at least one mental health outcome, while studies in construction and TICTM settings remain scarce. Only one study each was found for the construction sector and the TICTM setting, confirming the lack of organisational-level interventions for better mental health in sectors and settings other than healthcare. Due to this limited evidence base, no general trends can be identified. Nevertheless, the few studies suggest that organisational-level mental health promotion interventions have the potential to improve mental health outcomes in diverse settings when appropriately adapted to sector-specific conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.