Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41591472›Full record

GuidelineEuropean radiology2026

ESR Essentials: Perfusion MRI-practice recommendations by the European Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine and Biology.

Petra J van Houdt, Lena Václavů, Steven Sourbron, Eve S Shalom, Christian Federau, Mami Iima, Mira M Liu, Linda Knutsson, Ronnie Wirestam, Matthias Günther and 2 more

Abstract readReviewPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Prognostic value of IVIM-DWI parameters for overall and recurrence-free survival in resected esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Petra J van HoudtDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Lena VáclavůC.J. Gorter MRI Center, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Steven SourbronDivision of Clinical Medicine, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Eve S ShalomDivision of Clinical Medicine, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Christian FederauAI Medical AG, Zollikon, Switzerland.
Mami IimaDepartment of Fundamental Development for Advanced Low Invasive Diagnostic Imaging, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Mira M LiuBioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Linda KnutssonF.M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Ronnie WirestamDepartment of Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Matthias GüntherFraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine MEVIS, MR Physics, Bremen, Germany.
Matthias J P van OschC.J. Gorter MRI Center, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Rianne A van der HeijdenDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. r.a.vanderheijden@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6964-2536

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perfusion MRI techniques-including dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MRI, dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI, arterial spin labeling (ASL) MRI, and intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) MRI-hold strong potential as imaging techniques for diagnosing, staging, and monitoring disease across a range of clinical applications. However, clinical adoption, especially of quantitative parameters, remains variable across techniques. Key barriers to broader implementation include a lack of standardized acquisition and analysis protocols, leading to poor reproducibility and reduced clinical confidence. Additionally, limited awareness and understanding of certain techniques among radiologists contribute to underutilization in practice. This work provides practice recommendations to support radiologists in integrating perfusion MRI into routine clinical workflows. It includes guidance on technique selection, acquisition, and analysis, supported by a flowchart outlining typical imaging pathways. These efforts align with ongoing initiatives such as the Quantitative Medical Imaging Coalition (formerly QIBA) and the ISMRM Open Science Initiative for Perfusion Imaging (OSIPI), which are developing standards and tools to enhance reproducibility and clinical utility. Ultimately, the successful adoption of state-of-the-art perfusion MRI depends on close collaboration between clinicians, researchers, and industry stakeholders to ensure robust, standardized, and clinically meaningful application. KEY POINTS: Perfusion MRI parameters hold great promise as imaging biomarkers, but their clinical adoption, especially of quantitative parameters, remains variable across perfusion MRI techniques. An overview of perfusion MRI techniques, explaining the physics, illustrating clinical applications, and addressing common technical challenges, is provided to support perfusion MRI use in clinical practice. Successful adoption of state-of-the-art perfusion MRI depends on close collaboration between clinicians, researchers, and industry stakeholders to ensure robust, standardized, and clinically meaningful applications for patient care.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance AngiographyPerfusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingContrast MediaDynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance ImagingEuropeHumansReproducibility of ResultsSocieties, MedicalContrast MediaContrast mediaPerfusion magnetic resonance imagingRadiologists

Identifiers

PMID41591472
PMCPMC13212675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.