ArticleExperimental brain research2026
Cortical excitation does not drive changes in skin sympathetic nerve activity during single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation in humans.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We have shown that single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) inhibits muscle sympathetic nerve activity. However, this was likely due to arousal caused by the TMS pulses themselves, rather than altering the underlying neuronal circuitry. In extension, we have aimed to explore the effects of single-pulse TMS on skin sympathetic nerve activity (SSNA), which is more sensitive to arousal. It was hypothesised that TMS-evoked arousal would increase SSNA but would not generate de novo bursts from the dlPFC. Microneurographic recordings were taken from the right common peroneal nerve in 10 participants. TMS pulses were then delivered to the ipsilateral dlPFC at resting motor threshold (MT) of the finger, at stimulator output intensities 20% and 10% below MT, and at 110% and 120% of MT. The MT and 110% of MT intensities were also used in stimulating the right motor cortex and shoulder. Reductions in SSNA from baseline were seen at almost all intensities, and these mostly did not differ between intensities or sites despite the appearance of SSNA bursts after each pulse. This suggests that TMS is simply generating an arousal response, leading to initial excitation of SSNA followed by a period of sympathoinhibition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41591455What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.