ArticleWorld journal of urology2026
Old discussion, the same challenge: revisiting radiological predictors for urethroplasty complexity in male pelvic-fracture urethral injuries.
Article in World journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSeveral radiological predictors of pelvic fracture urethral injuries (PFUI) repair complexity have been proposed, but they have not been compared in external cohorts or tested against each other. This study evaluates the reliability and accuracy of indicators from Koraitim et al. and Yepes et al. in predicting surgical complexity in adult men with PFUI.
methodsRetrospective review of adult men who underwent PFUI repair between January 2011 and February 2024 in our center. Preoperative urethrocystographies (UCG) were analyzed for urethral gap length and gapometry index (Koraitim), and for the position of the proximal urethral stump (PUS) relative to the inferior margin of the pubic symphysis (Yepes). Predictors were compared with intraoperative complexity, defined by the need for advanced maneuvers or abdomino-perineal access. Accuracy parameters were calculated for each predictor and their combination.
resultsOf 81 patients treated in this period (median age 36 years), 55.6% (45/81) were excluded from analysis, with the absence of bladder neck opening being the most common cause (30/45). In the 36 evaluable cases, neither gapometry (p = 0.069) nor gapometry index (p = 0.158) were associated with complexity. Only PUS location above the inferior margin of the pubic symphysis was associated with it (p = 0.031). The presence of any predictor yielded 100% sensitivity and 42.3% specificity for predicting complexity. All patients without predictors underwent non-complex repairs (p = 0.071).
conclusionRadiological predictors showed limited reliability and accuracy, though PUS position correlated with complexity. The absence of radiological criteria may help identify straightforward cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41591452What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.