ArticleEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2026
Towards an international learning network for CAP Training- a Delphi study.
Article in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A learning network of clinician-educators and stakeholders provides a sustainable approach to co-creating best practices in child and adolescent psychiatry (CAP) training. This study assessed the feasibility and relevance of developing such a network in Europe. Participants (n = 137) from 28 European countries-trainees (n = 58), trainers (n = 50), and experts by lived experience (n = 27)-rated the importance of potential topics (areas of learning) and activities (ways of sharing) for an international training network. The study followed a Delphi methodology: in round 1, participants assessed the relevance of predefined topics and activities and suggested additions. In round 2, additions were evaluated, and participants prioritized the most relevant themes. Over 80% of participants rated 14 out of 21 topics and 12 out of 16 activities as (very) important. The five top-rated topics were assessment, medication, psychotherapy, transdiagnostic behaviors, and mental health policy advocacy. One-third of participants prioritized transition into young adulthood, lifelong learning for CAP trainees, interdisciplinary collaboration, public health, and family involvement. Variability emerged among stakeholder groups regarding leadership; online resources; cooperating with experts by lived experience; teaching scholarship; well-being of trainees; and requirements for registration and assessment. There was a strong consensus on the value of structured international collaboration in CAP training that supports development of an international CAP training network integrating diverse stakeholder perspectives. Such a network could enhance training quality, foster interdisciplinary cooperation, and standardize best practices in CAP education across Europe to address evolving needs in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41591416What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.