Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41591329›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Chemical Society2026

Computing Solvation Free Energies of Small Molecules with Experimental Accuracy.

J Harry Moore, Daniel J Cole, Gábor Csányi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

J Harry MooreEngineering Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, U.K.ORCID 0000-0001-5116-3027
Daniel J ColeSchool of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, U.K.
Gábor CsányiEngineering Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-8180-2034

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Free energies play a central role in characterizing the behavior of chemical systems and are among the most important quantities that can be calculated by molecular dynamics simulations. Solvation free energies in various organic solvents, in particular, are well-studied physicochemical properties of drug-like molecules and are commonly used to assess and optimize the accuracy of nonbonded parameters in empirical force fields and also as a fast-to-compute surrogate of performance for protein-ligand binding free energy estimation. Machine learned potentials (MLPs) show great promise as more accurate alternatives to empirical force fields but are not readily decomposed into physically motivated functional forms, which has thus far rendered them incompatible with standard alchemical free energy methods that manipulate individual pairwise interaction terms. However, since the accuracy of free energy calculations is highly sensitive to the force field, this is a key area in which MLPs have the potential to address the shortcomings of empirical force fields. In this work, we introduce an efficient alchemical free energy protocol that enables calculations of rigorous free energy differences in condensed phase systems modeled entirely by MLPs. Using a pretrained, transferable, alchemically equipped MLP model, we demonstrate subchemical accuracy for the solvation free energies of a wide range of organic molecules.

Identifiers

PMID41591329
PMCPMC12903862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.