ArticleJournal of the American Chemical Society2026
Computing Solvation Free Energies of Small Molecules with Experimental Accuracy.
Article in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enabling Biomolecular Simulations with Neural Network Potentials in GROMACS.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026Article
- Accurate Solution-Phase Thermodynamics via Composite Quantum Chemistry and Machine Learning: Application to Biomass Decomposition.Journal of computational chemistry · 2026Article
- Dual-Coordinate Relative Free Energy Simulations Using Machine-Learned Interatomic Potentials.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026Article
- Predicting Solvation Free Energies of Molecules and Ions via First-Principles and Machine-Learning Molecular Dynamics.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026Article
- Machine-Learned Extrapolation of Quantum Mechanical Energies in Implicit Solvent from Short to Long Oligopeptides.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- Machine-Learned Electrostatic Potentials for Accurate Hydration Free Energy Calculations.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026Article
- A conformational benchmark for optical property prediction with solvent-aware graph neural networks.Communications chemistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Free energies play a central role in characterizing the behavior of chemical systems and are among the most important quantities that can be calculated by molecular dynamics simulations. Solvation free energies in various organic solvents, in particular, are well-studied physicochemical properties of drug-like molecules and are commonly used to assess and optimize the accuracy of nonbonded parameters in empirical force fields and also as a fast-to-compute surrogate of performance for protein-ligand binding free energy estimation. Machine learned potentials (MLPs) show great promise as more accurate alternatives to empirical force fields but are not readily decomposed into physically motivated functional forms, which has thus far rendered them incompatible with standard alchemical free energy methods that manipulate individual pairwise interaction terms. However, since the accuracy of free energy calculations is highly sensitive to the force field, this is a key area in which MLPs have the potential to address the shortcomings of empirical force fields. In this work, we introduce an efficient alchemical free energy protocol that enables calculations of rigorous free energy differences in condensed phase systems modeled entirely by MLPs. Using a pretrained, transferable, alchemically equipped MLP model, we demonstrate subchemical accuracy for the solvation free energies of a wide range of organic molecules.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.