Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41591308›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of general physiology2026

The relationship between apparent potentiation and the magnitude of the control response.

Joe Henry Steinbach, Gustav Akk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of general physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Activation of the human β3 GABABiochemical pharmacology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Joe Henry SteinbachDepartment of Anesthesiology and the Taylor Family Institute for Innovative Psychiatric Research, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5513-9849
Gustav AkkDepartment of Anesthesiology and the Taylor Family Institute for Innovative Psychiatric Research, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6677-0655

Funding

GABAA receptors: function, physiology and involvement in anesthesiaR35GM140947 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI AKK, GUSTAV · 2021 to 2025
$1.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM140947NIH HHS R35GM140947Taylor Family Institute for Innovative Psychiatric Research XXX
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effect of a potentiating drug on ion channel function is typically evaluated by comparing current responses to the control agonist in the presence and absence of the potentiator. Differences in ratios of responses are then taken as proof of distinct potentiation properties when comparing modulation by different compounds. In these experiments, the concentration of the agonist is typically kept low to generate a small fractional control response. The precise relative magnitude of the control response is, however, not standardized among labs and can range from a concentration producing a response equal to just 2% of maximal (EC2) to over EC25 in different studies. Here, we have investigated the relationship between the magnitude of the control response and the expected response ratio. As the EC value of the control response increases, the ratio of responses to agonist in the presence and absence of the potentiator decreases. We provide equations to calculate the expected response ratios at different levels of control responses and free energy changes at different response ratios. Lastly, we discuss the effect of the value of EC of the control response on the efficacy of negative allosteric inhibitors.

Indexed as

Ion ChannelsAllosteric RegulationAnimalsDose-Response Relationship, DrugIon Channels

Identifiers

PMID41591308
PMCPMC13270432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.