ArticleToxins2026
A Cell-Based Potency Assay for Determining the Relative Potency of Botulinum Neurotoxin A Preparations Using Manual and Semi-Automated Procedures.
Article in Toxins, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cell-based potency assays (CBPAs) are required for the potency testing and commercial release of botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT)-based drug products. These CBPAs must account for the toxin's biological activities while meeting regulatory guidelines for precision and accuracy. Here, studies describe the characterization and qualification of the BoSapient CBPA and demonstrate that it is fit for use as a relative potency assay for BoNT/A-containing samples. The CBPA is operated in a 96-well plate format and relies upon the fluorescence emissions of a reporter that directly responds to BoNT/A activity. The BoSapient cell line expresses the BoNT/A-receptors SV2 and complex gangliosides, is responsive only to intact BoNT/A, and can robustly detect picomolar and sub-picomolar BoNT/A quantities, making the CBPA appropriate for quantifying BoNT/A-based drug products. The cell line was passaged 30 times without significant loss of reporter expression or BoNT/A sensitivity. Manual and semi-automated CBPA methods were developed and qualified according to regulatory guidelines and shown to have low bias (<4% from expected) and high precision (standard deviation < 8) across all test concentrations. Furthermore, the semi-automated method using the CBPA is demonstrated to improve intermediate precision by 39% compared to the manual method, while reducing operator dependency during method execution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.