SynthesisToxins2026
Botulinum Toxin Type A for the Prevention of Migraines: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews.
Synthesis in Toxins, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Botulinum Toxin Type A for Trigeminal and Postherpetic Neuralgia: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews.Drugs · 2026Pooled it
- One Molecule, Different Circuits? What Botulinum Toxin Can and Cannot Reveal About Craniocervical Comorbidity.Toxins · 2026Review
- The Safety of OnabotulinumtoxinA (OnabotA) During Pregnancy and Breastfeeding: Implications for Chronic Migraines.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Highly Cited Research on Botulinum Toxin: A Bibliometric Analysis of Clinical Trends, Influential Evidence, and Healthcare-Relevant Applications (1991-2022).Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
- Emerging pharmacological targets in migraine therapy: CGRP and beyond.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) is an established preventive therapy for chronic migraines; however, uncertainty remains regarding its comparative efficacy and safety. Thus, we aimed to summarize current evidence from high-quality systematic reviews of the therapeutic effects of BoNT-A in migraine management. An umbrella review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO. High-quality systematic reviews with meta-analysis evaluating BoNT-A efficacy were identified through five databases up to August 2024. Primary outcomes included monthly headache frequency and severity. Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed using the umbrella review checklist. Fourteen articles were included. Overall, quantitative evidence indicated favorable effects of BoNT-A compared with placebo for chronic migraines, across headache frequency, headache severity, and acute medication use, but less efficacy than topiramate and the CGRP monoclonal antibodies (CGRPmAbs) galcanezumab and fremanezumab. Though the adverse events were frequent, BoNT-A was generally well-tolerated. Comparative data suggested superior tolerability versus topiramate and a safety profile like CGRPmAbs. Although botulinum toxin type A is widely used as a preventive treatment for chronic migraines, the available evidence supports its efficacy at a moderate level. Further head-to-head and long-term analyses are needed to clarify its comparative role alongside newer biologic treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.