ArticleToxins2025
Systematic Approach to Reducing Errors in Deoxynivalenol Quantification: Insights from Bulk Wheat Sampling and Sample Preparation.
Article in Toxins, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate quantification of Deoxynovalienol (DON) in wheat is critical for food safety, but current methods suffer from poor reproducibility due to inconsistent operational parameters across the sampling and analysis workflow. To address this issue, this study focused on truck-loaded bulk wheat and conducted a comprehensive analysis covering the entire process from sampling to laboratory testing. By examining parameters at each stage-test portion, laboratory sample, composite sample, and primary sample-and applying the Monte Carlo simple random sampling principle, the variability associated with the full-process parameters for DON detection in wheat was systematically analyzed. The errors introduced at each step were evaluated, leading to the development of a representative measurement procedure for DON in truck-loaded bulk wheat. The results indicate that for truck-loaded bulk wheat, sampling should be conducted using a random distribution method with no fewer than 11 sampling points, each providing a primary sample of at least 500 g. The composite sample should be homogenized three times using a cone-and-quartering divider before subsampling. The laboratory sample should weigh no less than 750 g and be ground to a particle size of 1 mm. After thorough mixing of the ground sample, 5 g should be accurately weighed for analysis. This measurement procedure introduces a total relative error of 12.9%. The proposed protocol for DON detection in truck-loaded wheat offers a practical approach that minimizes error contribution from each parameter while maintaining low economic and time costs, ensuring feasibility for field implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.