ArticleDrug and alcohol review2026
Interrupted Time Series Analysis of Alcohol Use Disorder Treatment Utilisation During the Coronavirus Pandemic in Hamburg, Germany.
Article in Drug and alcohol review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Interrupted Time Series Analysis of Alcohol Use Disorder Treatment Utilisation During the Coronavirus Pandemic in Hamburg, Germany.Drug and alcohol review · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAlcohol use and treatment for alcohol use disorder (AUD) changed during the pandemic. Alcohol consumption increased among high-risk groups, while treatment utilisation declined, raising concerns about an expanding treatment gap. This study analyses inpatient and outpatient AUD treatment trends during the pandemic.
methodsWe analysed electronic health records from 5671 patients residing in Hamburg, Germany, who utilised at least one alcohol-related treatment between January 2016 and December 2021. Data from two statutory health insurance providers and two pension funds provided weekly numbers of patients receiving AUD treatment, including outpatient (psychiatric consultations, psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy), inpatient standard and intensive treatment, and outpatient and inpatient rehabilitation programs. Using a segmented regression approach, we examined changes over time for: (i) any treatment; (ii) outpatient treatment; and (iii) inpatient treatment across five periods of the pandemic: pre-pandemic, first lockdown, between lockdowns, second lockdown and post-second lockdown.
resultsDuring the first lockdown in spring 2020, AUD treatment utilisation declined by 27% before briefly returning to near pre-pandemic levels. A gradual decline was observed in later pandemic periods, even after containment measures were lifted. The decline was more pronounced in inpatient settings than in outpatient settings, at -45% and -15%, respectively, during the first lockdown. DISCUSSION AND
conclusionsThe utilisation of AUD treatment services dropped substantially during the pandemic, particularly in inpatient settings. This reduction may have contributed to the rise in alcohol-related deaths during this period. This study is the first to assess long-term inpatient and outpatient treatment trends across multiple pandemic phases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.