ArticleTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)2025
Detection and Classification of Alzheimer's Disease Using Deep and Machine Learning.
Article in Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesAlzheimer's disease is the leading cause of dementia, marked by progressive cognitive decline and a severe socioeconomic burden. Early and accurate diagnosis is crucial to enhancing patient outcomes, yet traditional clinical and imaging assessments are often limited in sensitivity, particularly at early stages. This study presents a dual-modal framework that integrates symptom-based clinical data with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) models, enhanced by explainable AI (XAI).
methodsFour ML classifiers-K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree (DT), and Random Forest (RF)-were trained on demographic and clinical features. For stage-wise classification, five DL models-CNN, EfficientNetB3, DenseNet-121, ResNet-50, and MobileNetV2-were applied to MRI scans. Interpretability was incorporated through SHAP and Grad-CAM visualizations.
resultsRandom Forest achieves the highest accuracy of 97% on clinical data, while CNN achieves the best overall performance of 94% in MRI-based staging. SHAP and Grad-CAM were used to find clinically relevant characteristics and brain areas, including hippocampal atrophy and ventricular enlargement.
conclusionsIntegrating clinical and imaging data and interpretable AI improves the accuracy and reliability of AD staging. The proposed model offers a valid and clear diagnostic route, which can assist clinicians in making timely diagnoses and adjusting individual treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.